Millions Recovered
Causes of Construction Accidents Connecticut: Understanding Common Site Hazards, Safety Violations, and Negligence Factors
Last Updated - October 14, 2026
Read Time - Ex: 14 minutes
- Key Takeaways
- Common Causes of Construction Accidents in Connecticut
- Falls from Heights
- Struck-By Incidents
- Caught-In/Between Incidents
- Electrocutions and Arc-Flash Injuries
- Equipment and Tool Failures
- Connecticut Realities That Increase Risk
- Construction Safety Violations in CT: What Counts and Why It Matters
- Understanding Violations vs. Accidents
- Common Categories of Violations
- How Violations Become Accidents
- Who Is Responsible for Preventing Violations?
- Negligence at Work Site: What It Means and How It’s Evaluated
- Common Examples of Negligence on Construction Sites
- Waterbury-Specific Considerations
- How Negligence Is Typically Documented
- Work-Zone and Roadway Incidents Tied to Construction
- Connecticut’s Duty to Stop and Report After a Crash
- Non-Motor Vehicle Involvement
- Crashes Involving Animals
- Breakdown Safety Near Work Zones
- Prevention Playbook: What Workers and Supervisors Can Do Tomorrow
- Pre-Shift Hazard Assessment
- High-Impact Controls Matched to Top Hazards
- Reporting Unsafe Conditions
- Fault Insight: How Responsibility Gets Sorted Out
- Moving Forward
- About the Author
- FAQ
Key Takeaways
- Falls, struck-by, caught-in/between, electrocutions, and equipment failures are the most common causes of construction accidents in Connecticut.
- Common safety violations—missing guardrails, inadequate scaffolding, lack of GFCIs, and poor trench protection—map directly to these accident types.
- Multiple parties share responsibility: employers, general contractors, subcontractors, and equipment owners can all be liable depending on control and notice.
- Local factors—seasonal weather, tight urban job sites, and older building renovations—often increase risk in Connecticut.
- Documenting hazards, training, and communications is critical to determine negligence and accountability after an incident.
Common Causes of Construction Accidents in Connecticut
Construction accidents rarely happen out of nowhere. Most follow recognizable patterns. Understanding these categories—and the root causes behind them—is the first step toward prevention.
Falls from Heights
Falls remain the leading cause of death and serious injury on construction sites nationwide, and Connecticut sites are no different.
These injuries happen when workers fall from ladders, scaffolds, roofs, aerial lifts, open edges, or through unprotected floor openings.
Why falls happen:
- Missing or incorrectly installed guardrails
- Unprotected edges and uncovered floor holes
- Ladders set at wrong angles, overreaching, or using damaged equipment
- No personal fall arrest system (harness) or anchoring to weak points
- Poor housekeeping that creates trip hazards
- Weather conditions like ice, rain, or wind
- Rushing to meet deadlines
What prevention looks like:
- Pre-task planning before elevated work begins
- Correct ladder selection and setup
- Guardrail systems on scaffolds and open edges
- Covers secured over floor openings
- Personal fall arrest system training with proper anchor points
- Daily scaffold inspections before use
Struck-By Incidents
Being struck by falling objects or moving equipment is another major category of construction accidents.
This includes everything from a hammer dropped from overhead to a dump truck backing over a worker.
Why struck-by incidents happen:
- Improper rigging and unsecured loads
- Missing toe boards or debris nets on scaffolds
- No exclusion zones around crane operations or heavy equipment
- Missing spotters for backing vehicles
- Poor visibility conditions
- Inadequate traffic control in or near roadways
What prevention looks like:
- Hard hats worn consistently in designated areas
- Tool lanyards to prevent drops
- Controlled access zones around overhead work
- Spotters and backup alarms for equipment
- Clear hand-signal communication plans
- Designated walkways away from equipment paths
Caught-In/Between Incidents
These accidents happen when workers get crushed, pinned, or trapped between equipment, materials, or collapsing structures.
Trench collapses are among the most deadly scenarios in this category.
Why these accidents happen:
- Unshored trenches and unstable soil
- Water accumulation weakening excavation walls
- Working within the swing radius of equipment
- Improper stacking of materials
- Missing machine guards or failure to follow lockout procedures
What prevention looks like:
- Trench protective systems (sloping, shoring, or shielding)
- Competent person inspections before anyone enters an excavation
- Spoil piles kept at safe distances from trench edges
- Barricades around excavations
- Clear swing-radius boundaries marked and enforced
Electrocutions and Arc-Flash Injuries
Electrical accidents on construction sites happen when workers contact live wiring, overhead power lines, faulty temporary power systems, or damaged extension cords.
Why electrocutions happen:
- No ground-fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) protection
- Wet conditions combined with electrical equipment
- Unmarked or misidentified underground utilities
- Equipment like ladders or cranes contacting overhead lines
- Damaged cords used without inspection
What prevention looks like:
- Locating and marking all utilities before digging
- Maintaining minimum safe distances from overhead lines
- Using GFCIs on all temporary power
- Inspecting cords and tools daily
- Lockout/tagout procedures where applicable
Equipment and Tool Failures
Machinery malfunctions, missing guards, and improper tool use cause a significant share of construction injuries.
This ranges from table saw kickback to aerial lift failures.
Why equipment failures cause injuries:
- Skipped maintenance or ignored repair needs
- Disabled safety features to “save time”
- Inadequate training on equipment operation
- Using the wrong tool for the job
What prevention looks like:
- Pre-shift equipment inspections
- Documented maintenance logs
- Training and authorization requirements for equipment operators
- Zero tolerance for disabled guards or safety devices

Connecticut Realities That Increase Risk
Certain factors common to Connecticut construction can make hazards worse:
Seasonal weather: Ice, snow, and rain affect footing on elevated surfaces and reduce visibility. Connecticut’s freeze-thaw cycles can deteriorate conditions quickly.
Seasonal weather
Tight urban job sites: Cities like Waterbury often have limited staging areas, which means closer interaction between workers, equipment, vehicles, and pedestrians. This increases struck-by and traffic-related risks.
Older building renovation: Many Connecticut projects involve structures built decades ago. Hidden hazards—unknown wiring, structural deterioration, lead paint, asbestos—add layers of risk beyond the primary accident types.
Construction Safety Violations in CT: What Counts and Why It Matters
When people talk about “safety violations,” they’re referring to failures to follow required safety rules and accepted practices designed to protect workers.
In most cases, these rules trace back to OSHA standards and site-specific safety plans.
Understanding Violations vs. Accidents
A violation is the unsafe condition or practice itself—the missing guardrail, the damaged cord, the skipped training.
An accident is the harmful event that may result. Not every violation causes an accident, but violations dramatically increase the odds that something will go wrong.
Common Categories of Violations
Fall protection failures:
- Unprotected leading edges
- Workers at heights without harnesses where required
- Scaffolds missing guardrails or proper planking
Scaffolding and ladder violations:
- Missing planks or guardrails on scaffolds
- Overloaded scaffolds beyond rated capacity
- Using ladders as work platforms without proper setup
Training and communication failures:
- Workers operating equipment without required training
- No hazard communication for chemicals on site
- Missing toolbox talks or safety briefings
PPE failures:
- No hard hats, eye protection, or high-visibility clothing where required
- PPE rules not enforced by supervision
Electrical safety failures:
- No GFCIs on temporary power
- Damaged extension cords in use
- Unprotected temporary wiring
Trenching and excavation failures:
- No protective systems in trenches over four feet deep
- No competent person conducting daily inspections
- Spoil piles placed too close to edges
How Violations Become Accidents
The connection between violations and injuries is usually straightforward:
- Missing guardrail → fall from edge: A worker steps backward on a rooftop without edge protection.
- No spotter or exclusion zone → struck by equipment: An excavator operator can’t see behind the machine; a worker walks into the blind spot.
- Unprotected trench → cave-in: Soil collapses on workers in an excavation that wasn’t shored or sloped.
- No GFCI + wet surface → electrocution: A worker using a power tool in standing water experiences a fatal shock.
Who Is Responsible for Preventing Violations?
Multiple parties typically share responsibility for site safety:
- Employers are responsible for training workers, providing PPE, establishing safe procedures, and enforcing rules.
- General contractors usually control overall site coordination, including subcontractor oversight and hazard controls that affect the entire project.
- Subcontractors are responsible for task-specific safety for their own crews.
- Equipment owners and rental companies have duties regarding maintenance and equipment condition.
Negligence at Work Site: What It Means and How It’s Evaluated
Negligence is a legal concept, but it’s not complicated. At its core, negligence means failing to act with reasonable care, resulting in foreseeable harm to someone else.
On a construction site, this often looks like ignoring known hazards, skipping required safety steps, or failing to fix dangerous conditions.
Common Examples of Negligence on Construction Sites
- Poor supervision: Allowing workers to skip fall protection without consequence
- Unsafe scheduling pressures: Pushing crews to rush, leading to shortcuts and fatigue
- Inadequate training: Assigning workers to equipment they haven’t been trained on
- Failure to warn: Not communicating about open holes, live wires, or unstable surfaces
- Poor housekeeping: Debris, cords, and materials blocking paths or creating trip hazards
Waterbury-Specific Considerations
Urban construction sites in cities like Waterbury present particular challenges.
Streets are narrow, staging areas are limited, and work often happens near active traffic and pedestrians. Renovation and retrofit projects are common, and conditions can change quickly as older structures reveal hidden hazards.
In tight sites, planning and traffic control become even more critical. Negligence at work site Waterbury projects might involve failure to maintain adequate barriers, missing flaggers for traffic control, or inadequate separation between work areas and public access.
How Negligence Is Typically Documented
When something goes wrong, establishing what happened—and who failed to act reasonably—depends on evidence. People commonly gather:
- Photos and videos of the hazard and surrounding area (missing guardrails, absent signage, equipment positions)
- Incident reports filed immediately after the accident
- Daily logs showing work activities and conditions
- Toolbox talk records and safety meeting notes
- Training records and PPE issuance logs
- Witness statements and contact information
- Equipment inspection and maintenance records
- Work orders or communications showing hazards were reported but not addressed
Work-Zone and Roadway Incidents Tied to Construction
Construction accidents don’t always happen within the boundaries of a job site.
Workers get injured in highway work zones, site vehicles enter and leave public roads, and passing traffic sometimes strikes workers or equipment. When a crash occurs, Connecticut law imposes specific duties.
Connecticut’s Duty to Stop and Report After a Crash
Under Conn. Gen. Stat. §14-224, any driver involved in a crash causing death must immediately stop, render needed aid, and provide their name, address, license, and registration information to any officer or witness.
If unable to do so at the scene, the driver must promptly report the accident location, circumstances, and personal information to police.
The same statute applies to crashes causing serious or minor injury, or only property damage. Drivers must stop, render assistance if needed, and exchange identifying information—or report to police if that’s not possible.
Practical steps after any crash:
- Stop immediately and stay at or near the scene (when safe)
- Call 911 if anyone is hurt
- Provide your name, address, license, and registration as required
- Cooperate with responding officers
- Document conditions if you’re able to do so safely
Non-Motor Vehicle Involvement
Work zones can involve cyclists, pedestrians, or other non-motorized traffic.
Under Conn. Gen. Stat. §14-225, anyone riding or driving a non-motor vehicle on a public road who causes injury or property damage must stop immediately, determine the extent of injury, render aid, and provide their name and address.
Crashes Involving Animals
Under Conn. Gen. Stat. §14-226, any driver who injures or kills a dog must stop, render assistance if possible, and provide identifying information to the owner or a witness—or report to police with the location and description of the dog.
Breakdown Safety Near Work Zones
Work trucks, delivery vehicles, and commuters traveling near construction zones face elevated risks when breakdowns occur. The Connecticut State Police recommends that any driver whose vehicle breaks down on a highway should:
- Pull to the right shoulder immediately
- Turn on hazard lights
- Remain in the vehicle if safe
- Call 911 with your location and vehicle description
Prevention Playbook: What Workers and Supervisors Can Do Tomorrow
Understanding causes is only useful if it leads to action. Here’s what effective prevention looks like in practice.
Pre-Shift Hazard Assessment
Before work begins each day—and whenever conditions change—crews should conduct a brief hazard review.
This is sometimes called a Job Hazard Analysis or “take five” assessment.
Questions to ask:
- Where can someone fall today? What’s our fall protection plan?
- Where are vehicles and equipment moving? Who is the spotter?
- Any overhead power lines or temporary electrical near our work?
- Any trenches or excavations? Who is the competent person inspecting?
- What’s changed since yesterday that could create new hazards?
High-Impact Controls Matched to Top Hazards
For falls: Guardrail systems, personal fall arrest systems, ladder and scaffold rules, secured hole covers
For struck-by hazards: Exclusion zones around equipment, hard hats, tool tethering, written traffic control plans
For caught-in/between hazards: Trench protective systems, clearly marked equipment swing radius boundaries, lockout awareness training
For electrical hazards: GFCIs on all temporary power, daily cord inspections, utility locate and marking before excavation
Reporting Unsafe Conditions
Workers who see hazards should report them immediately. A simple approach:
“I’m reporting an unsafe condition: [describe the hazard]. It’s located at [specific location]. The risk is [type of injury possible]. A safer control would be [guardrail/spotter/GFCI/etc.].”
Workers should also know they have the right to remove themselves from situations presenting imminent danger, and should follow their site’s reporting procedures.
Fault Insight: How Responsibility Gets Sorted Out
When a construction accident happens, investigators work backward from the injury to understand what failed. A useful framework:
Hazard (unsafe condition) → Violation (rule or practice not followed) → Incident (accident event) → Injury (harm suffered) → Evidence (documentation) → Accountability (who had control and duty)
For example, if fall protection was missing and a worker fell, there’s likely a safety violation. Whether that rises to negligence depends on who controlled the area, who knew or should have known about the hazard, and whether reasonable steps were available to prevent it.
When a third-party driver enters a work zone and strikes a worker, the analysis involves both the driver’s conduct and whether the traffic control plan was adequate. More on who can pursue claims is discussed at who can sue construction accident CT.
Moving Forward
The causes of construction accidents Connecticut workers face are, for the most part, predictable.
Falls, struck-by incidents, caught-in/between hazards, electrocutions, and equipment failures follow recognizable patterns—and they’re preventable with proper controls.
Construction safety violations CT inspectors document most frequently map directly to these injury risks.
When rules aren’t followed, the odds of harm increase dramatically.
Negligence at work site Waterbury locations—and across Connecticut—typically involves ignored hazards, weak supervision, or missing controls. Documentation of conditions, training, and communications often determines how responsibility gets assigned.
If you were hurt on a construction site or witnessed a serious hazard:
- Get medical attention first
- Report the incident through proper channels
- Document conditions as thoroughly as possible (photos, notes, witness contact information)
- Preserve any records related to training, safety meetings, or equipment
- Seek appropriate guidance based on your situation — see workers’ compensation benefits Connecticut
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Construction accident cases involve complex factual and legal questions that vary based on individual circumstances. If you have questions about a specific situation, consult with a qualified attorney.
About the Author
Lou Etemi is a Connecticut personal injury lawyer and co-founder of Etemi Law Injury Lawyers who represents individuals and families injured by negligence. He has helped hundreds of clients resolve serious injury claims by combining disciplined case preparation, medical understanding, and persistent negotiation with insurance companies. Lou is known for his hands-on advocacy, strong client relationships, and client-first approach to accountability and fair compensation.
FAQ
Q: What are the most common causes of construction accidents in Connecticut?
A: The leading causes are falls from heights, struck-by incidents, caught-in/between incidents, electrocutions, and equipment or tool failures. Local factors like seasonal weather and tight urban sites often increase risk.
Q: Who can be held responsible after a construction accident?
A: Responsibility depends on control and notice; employers, general contractors, subcontractors, and equipment owners may share liability depending on who had the duty and ability to prevent the hazard.
Q: What should I document if I witness a hazard or an accident?
A: Take photos and videos, collect witness contact information, save incident reports and toolbox talk records, and preserve training and equipment inspection logs. These items are often crucial to establishing negligence.
Q: What are my obligations if I’m involved in a crash near a work zone?
A: Connecticut law requires drivers to stop, render aid if needed, and exchange identifying information. See Conn. Gen. Stat. §14-224 for details.
Q: Where can I find more guidance about traffic-related incidents in construction zones?
A: For issues where a vehicle and construction zone interact—such as determining fault in a collision—see resources on work-zone traffic incidents and consult legal counsel as needed.
- 1 30+ Years of Combined Experience
- 2 Millions Recovered for Injured Clients
- 3 No Fees Unless We Win
Share your information, and our team will be in touch.
Our Practice Areas
- Personal Injury
- Car Accidents
- Catastrophic Injury
- Defective Products
- Dog Bites
- Medical Malpractice
- Motorcycle Accidents
- Nursing Home Neglect
- Pedestrian Accidents
- Slip and Fall
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Truck Accidents
- Wrongful Death
Case Results
-
Rear-End Collision
$850,000
-
Tractor Trailer Accident
$1,600,000
-
Wrongful Death Judgment
$24,500,000
Judgment against drunk driver in wrongful death case.
-
Wrongful Death Judgment
$5,500,000
Drunk driver in wrongful death car accident.
-
Auto v. Auto Accident
$600,000
-
Motor Vehicle Collision
$375,000
Wrist injury from car accident.
-
Car Crash
$100,000
Hand injury caused during automobile crash.
-
Motor Vehicle Collision
$325,000
Car accident with highly disputed liability.
-
Rear-End Collision
$100,000
Settlement in connection with rear-end collision resulting in whiplash injury.
-
Commercial Motor Vehicle Collision
$2,490,000
-
Motor Vehicle Collision
$1,100,000
Involving neck and back injuries.
-
Automobile Collision
$500,000
Case involving automobile collision resulting in serious bodily injuries.
-
Motor Vehicle Collision
$1,200,000
Award from arbitration.
-
Soft Tissue Settlement
$300,000
Low velocity soft tissue settlement.
-
Rear-End Collision
$195,000
Settlement involving minor property damage rear end collision resulting in neck injury.
-
Motor Vehicle Crash
$600,000
Involving spinal injury.
-
Motor Vehicle Collision
$225,000
Settlement involving motor vehicle collision with neck injury.
-
Automobile Collision
$100,000
Case involving automobile collision resulting in soft tissue injury to the neck and back.
-
Dog Bite Injuries
$600,000
-
Car Accident
$100,000
Policy limit settlement for nose injury from airbag deployment.
-
Rear-End Collision
$250,000
-
Mediated Settlement
$155,000
Mediated settlement in case involving complex claims of injury.
-
Rear-End Collision
$100,000
Settlement in connection with hit-and-run rear end collision caught on camera. The case involved soft-tissue injuries.
-
Hit and Run Highway Crash
$395,000
-
Rear-End Collision
$100,000
Settlement involving rear end motor vehicle collision resulting in hand injury.
-
Motor Vehicle Collision
$250,000
Settlement involving motor vehicle collision involving neck injury.
-
Head-On Car Crash
$285,000
Leg injury following head-on car crash.
-
Motor Vehicle Collision
$75,000
Case involving motor vehicle collision resulting in bulging discs in lower back.
Posted on Google![]()
Wislyne N15 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a great experience, I have no complaints. It was such a smooth process. Michelle is so so sweet, she was so communicative and understanding and patient with me. Ron is also awesome!!Posted on Google![]()
Isidro R31 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Lou and Nicole were an absolute blessing and have helped me out so much! Love them both!Posted on Google![]()
Jennifer S36 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Amazing service… pleasure to work with the whole team to get max payout.Posted on Google![]()
Ahmed I37 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a great experience with Etemi Law throughout the entire process. They were very professional, patient, and always kept me informed every step of the way. They genuinely cared about my situation and made the process much easier and less stressful for me. I truly appreciate their hard work, communication, and dedication. I would definitely recommend Etemi Law to anyone looking for a personal injury lawyer.Posted on Google![]()
Aljbnor T129 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Etemi law is the best! I had attorney Lou And paralegal Michelle and they got the job done. I highly recommend them to anyone in an accident!Posted on Google![]()
Heaven H136 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a great experience working with Etemi Law. They were professional, knowledgeable, and always kept me informed throughout the process. They took the time to answer my questions and made me feel confident every step of the way. I truly appreciate their hard work and dedication. From start to finish, my lawyer went above and beyond for me. They were responsive, compassionate, and fought hard for the best outcome. I felt supported during a stressful time and am very grateful for their help. Would highly recommend them to anyone needing legal assistancePosted on Google![]()
Anisa B147 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Best place to go too!!Posted on Google![]()
Kimberly C148 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Everyone was very friendly. I Was very satisfied with Lou Etemi.Posted on Google![]()
Victor J163 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Ron ( lawyer)at Etemi Law helped us alot in our case. He was honest and very informational as this was our first case. If I needed a lawyer again I would go through Etemi Law. I have nothing but the best things to say about them. Very pleased. Each n every member of this law firm professional n courteous, specialy Ms VE, always kept us informed about casePosted on Google![]()
Bijt E167 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Etemi law is the best firm ever. Michelle is the bomb. I highly recommend them as a firm to anyone! Best attorneys ever!Posted on Google![]()
Loue E173 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Outstanding experiencePosted on Google![]()
Samir D182 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was involved in a serious crash and Etemi Law went above and beyond to help me through the process. They were with me every step of the way. If you are ever in need of an attorney, this is the firm that I recommend. They care about communication and they care about their clients. Ron and V were there for me from the beginning and I am super grateful. Highly recommend!!Posted on Google![]()
Yameci185 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Attorneys are amazing here! Will 100% recommend them to anyone in need of lawyers ☺️Posted on Google![]()
Clams185 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Very very grateful I was referred to Etemi Law. Lou, Ron & Michelle made me feel like family, and this may sound crazy but I’m going to miss them. I can tell you with certainty that they are all great at what they do, and I would not hesitate at all to recommend them to friends and family. 100% the best, not even a close second to Etemi Law.Posted on Google![]()
Steve D185 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I was referred to Lou Etemi by close friend and they were extremely professional. I’m very grateful for the way they handled me personally and my case they were very personable and they carried a great deal about how I felt and they treated me like family.Posted on Google![]()
Jefrey R199 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I can’t say enough great things about Lou and his entire team. From the very beginning, they treated me with professionalism, respect, and genuine care. After my car accident, I was stressed and unsure about the process, but Lou and his crew made everything feel manageable and kept me informed every step of the way. Their communication was excellent, always answering my questions and making sure I understood what was going on. You can tell they truly fight for their clients and don’t settle for less than what you deserve. Thanks to their hard work and dedication, they were able to reach a settlement for my case, and I couldn’t be more grateful. If you’re looking for an attorney who is knowledgeable, responsive, and truly has your best interests at heart, I highly recommend Lou and his team. They really go above and beyond.Posted on Google![]()
Derek C202 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Ron and V were the best possible team to land with when I was hit head on. I was referred to Etemi by a friend, somewhat out of necessity, and again...can't imagine I would have had a better support team or outcome. Not only did they educate me on the process, but also understood and planned for how insurance companies are trained to approach my specific case. If you are in a serious accident, Etemi deserves an interview to handle your situation. Thanks again guys.Posted on Google![]()
Joel M209 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Coming to Etemi Law made me feel comfortable and safe knowing I have the best lawyers on my case. Lou and his paralegal Shakiba Malek go above and beyond to make sure they get the best results in my current work injury case. Not once has my questions gone unheard or unanswered, I highly recommend them and their team. Extremely thankful for there hard work. Thank you! Lou and ShakibaPosted on Google![]()
Mergime Z209 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
No words can describe how much EVERYONE in this firm will do for you! they work hard and play even harder! best phone call you will ever make is with Etemi Law.Posted on Google![]()
Joshua S215 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Best out there Highly recommended!!Posted on Google![]()
Nikita C227 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Ron Lou and staff took excellent care of me!Posted on Google![]()
Jass N233 days agoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Great quality care. I am very pleased with my time spent, great injury lawyer. Helped me when my hand was injured and I am very greatful.
Etemi Law Injury Lawyers
Founded by Waterbury natives Ron and Lou Etemi, our firm is deeply connected to the communities we serve. We bring determined advocacy and proven results to serious injury cases across Connecticut.
